the rpas test

[alanh]

I paid the $10 and took the test-It has nothing to do with model airplanes-they ask questions only a real pilot would know-It asks u what to do if u get a warning from the tower-its pure insanity-this test will destroy the hobby- who in their right mind would buy a model airplane if they have to answer such stupid questions. The only way to pass is to get all the answers and just cheat. They ask where do you get weather info or what happens when u approach geese. Its insane.

[Andrew Fernie]

There is a study guide here https://www.aerialevolution.ca/rpas101/. The test is officially open-book (read open computer), so that should help. I am going to give it a try once I work through the guide.

[Andrew Fernie]

You can also download the CAR from the TCCA web site, although I could only find a way to download the full set. In that case ignore all but CAR IX.

[Florin]

Thanks Alan for opening this thread, to help each other pass the exam
Anyone, feel free to chime in your experiences in this "GENERAL DISCUSSION" forum!

Well, I just started looking at that too... as usual, the most important information is at the end
See from pages 116 of the document below (the main one)

https://www.aerialevolution.ca/wp-co...1_EN-Final.pdf

[Matt]

I skimmed through the materials on Sunday and wrote the exam in half the time allotted and passed. Honestly, guys, it's not that hard. No need to panic. I think everyone can pass if you just stayed focused and answer the questions logically. You can refer to the materials to look up answers.

[Xavier]

You could find of the answer using google. You copy-paste the question and you get the answer. Some questions are indeed completely ridiculous for model airplanes. Like 'what is the best climb rate ?' Who cares for a model airplane. They are all overpowered and will get to flying altitude by the end of the runway. However, we are stuck it.

[MichaelLevy]

With Chatgpt you can probably do it in 10 minutes.

[MichaelLevy]

This is the answer from Chat GPT on whether TC's new RPAS new regulations make any sense:

As an AI language model, I do not hold personal opinions. However, I can provide an analysis of the issue based on the available information.

Transport Canada's new regulations on Remotely Piloted Aircraft Systems (RPAS) aim to ensure the safe operation of drones in Canadian airspace. The regulations require all drone operators to register their drones, obtain a pilot certificate, and follow certain operating rules.

However, the inclusion of radio-controlled airplanes in these regulations may not make sense because radio-controlled airplanes are fundamentally different from drones in several ways.

Firstly, radio-controlled airplanes are typically flown by hobbyists and enthusiasts who fly their airplanes for recreation and entertainment purposes. These airplanes are often flown at lower altitudes and in designated areas such as parks, fields, and airfields.

On the other hand, drones are typically used for commercial and industrial purposes, such as aerial photography, delivery, inspection, and surveillance. Drones can fly at higher altitudes and over longer distances, which poses a greater risk to other aircraft and people on the ground.

Secondly, radio-controlled airplanes are typically smaller and less powerful than drones, which means they pose a lower risk of injury or damage in the event of an accident. Drones, on the other hand, are larger and more powerful, which means they can cause serious harm to people and property in the event of a collision or crash.

Finally, the regulations for radio-controlled airplanes are already covered under existing regulations for model aircraft, which require operators to fly their airplanes in designated areas and follow certain safety guidelines.

In conclusion, while the new regulations on RPAS aim to promote safety and accountability in drone operations, including radio-controlled airplanes in these regulations may not make sense as they pose a lower risk to safety and are already covered under existing regulations for model aircraft.

[alanh]

I knew years ago that drones would ruin the Rc Airplane hobby and the people who set this in motion are incompetent and just idiots. Its like forcing kids with RC cars to take the written drivers license test-absolute insanity and typical of the Liberal government obsession with controlling every aspect of peoples lives and behaviour. The next step will be forcing us to file a flight report with the Trudeau tower before we take off and getting our planes to get de-iced or maybe getting our models tested every 6 months by federal investigators for safety issues LOL
I also think MAAC should not grant drone flyers any membership and all RC clubs should ban these things from using our fields. Separate the 2 hobbies-let them organize their version of MAAC and have their own clubs and fields and then MAAC can go back to the government and explain the 2 entities are separate and not related to each other and then force the drone owners to have their own test and get our hobby back where it was before this drone crap was started. My opinion.

[X.WAY]

Has the regulations gotten so bad that Canadian RC Modelers can only fly out of Plattsburgh , New York?

Here's the link :
https://www.wcax.com/2023/02/27/cana...kies-practice/